23
May , 2017
Tuesday

KingCentric

"The State is Concentric, but the Individual is Eccentric", James Joyce

  I was notified by the clerk on Friday September 12th, that I have been once ...
There was a point during this term of council where I thought there was the ...
Shoppers Drug Mart Soon to Make First Major Impact in Village Core As reported in the ...
I was notified by the clerk unofficially on Friday September 1oth, that I have been ...
As the appointed Councillor to the King Environmental Advisory Committee, (KEAC)  it is my great ...

Archive for October, 2010

Vote for the Renewal of King

Posted by Cleve Mortelliti On October - 21 - 2010 ADD COMMENTS

Dear Fellow King Residents,

On Monday October 25th, you will have the power to steer King in a positive new direction by electing a new Mayor for our Township.

King needs renewal on council, and we need it in the Mayor’s chair more than ever. Margaret Black has lost the confidence and the trust of the majority of the Township’s residents for having abandoned us when we needed her most while she sought the Newmarket-Aurora federal Liberal nomination.

Click to Open

While doing this:

Click to Open

1) She failed to stand up for the Holland Marsh Growing Area from a Gas Fired Power Generating Plant – the crown jewel of King, the vegetable basket of North America, the place that puts healthy food on our tables.

2) And after telling everyone in 2006 that either King City or Nobleton would be the site of the new Township Recreation Facility, she not so coincidentally sent a 9.44 million dollar grant to Schomberg at the exact same time that she was rumoured as the Liberal candidate for Newmarket-Aurora – a nice little farewell gift to the home of her grass roots support over the last 15 years.

———————————————–

She’s let the majority of King down so badly that it would be just plain wrong for her to be handed the privilege to wear the chain of office again. And that’s the fear I have with 4 candidates running for Mayor. The reality is that this is a two horse race between Steve Pellegrini and Margaret Black. The others, with no disrespect intended, do not have the Township wide appeal to win this.

Click to Open

So to all those who now feel that change is needed, you won’t change anything if you vote for either of the other two. All you’re going to do is split your vote, and very likely hand the mayoralty back to Margaret Black.

But if you feel that a new direction is needed, then on October 25th, help me to ensure that every village and hamlet, every rural resident and every corner of King is fairly and respectfully represented in the future.

On Monday October 25th lets all vote for Steve Pellegrini. It’s the only way to ensure your vote for change will make a difference.

Sincerely,

Cleve Mortelliti,

Councillor – Ward 1, Township of King

Follow the Dates…Connect the Dots…

Posted by Cleve Mortelliti On October - 18 - 2010 ADD COMMENTS

————————————————————————————————

I have looked over Jordan and I have seen, things are not what they seem.

Roger Waters

————————————————————————————————

  • May- June 2007 – EDAC discusses “Power Energy Issues and Opportunities” of hosting a Gas Fired Peaker Plant in King.
  • July-November 2007 – a series of staff reports advance this notion and staff is directed to create an online survey to gauge public reaction to the idea of hosting a peaker plant.
  • January – April 2008 – Reaction – NOT Good.
  • April 14, 2008 – Mortelliti and Underhill put forward Motion to Oppose Peaker Plant
  • April 23Mortelliti responds to King Sentinel Editorial re: his motion to reject the Peaker Plant
  • April 28, 2008 – Motion to Oppose Peaker Plant – defeated by 4 to 3 vote
  • April 28, 2008 – Town of Georgina PASSES motion to oppose Peaker Plant
  • May to June 2008 – Remainder of Northern York Region Municipalities pass motions to oppose Peaker Plant
  • June 2008 – King the only Municipality to NOT pass a motion to oppose
  • July 2008 – Black brings forward Motion to “oppose all applications for a Peaker Plant”
  • August 2008 – Black is quoted in NRU as saying:

“I don’t think you’d have a willing host anywhere. I just don’t see that happening in the Greater Toronto Area. That doesn’t mean you don’t PROCESS and understand THE APPLICATIONS. (?) I happen to think there’s a tremendous need and I also think that we can site it in a place somewhere in these municipalities, which will not affect anyone,” Black said. “I happen to believe that the effect of the air emissions is minimal.” (!)

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————–

Election Day is October 25.

VOTE!

King City BLACK and Blue Over Schomberg Rec Centre

Posted by Cleve Mortelliti On October - 3 - 2010 7 COMMENTS

There was a point during this term of council where I thought there was the possibility that Mayor Black might redeem herself to King City residents for the tumult she brought here during her tenure as Mayor vis a vis the King City Community Plan process and the implementation of sanitary servicing. But that quickly evaporated when she slammed the door on a prime opportunity to pull this Township together by misappropriating a 10 million dollar grant from the provincial and federal governments.

Doing the right thing by King City (and Nobleton) could have all but secured her re-election as Mayor. There is no doubt the Schomberg Arena was in dire need of replacement, but even though that building is 50 years old and well past its service life, the King City Arena is 40 years old and not far behind.

With council having passed a Parks and Recreation Master Plan in 2004 after extensive public consultation, the plan going forward was to build a multi pad, multi use facility that could service the whole Township. A facility with 3 ice rinks all under one roof. And with the clock ticking on the Schomberg Arena, and the growing threat of it being condemned after having seen a similar fate to an arena up in Orillia, the timing of stimulus money could not have been better. A golden egg of opportunity to fulfill the vision of the Master Plan literally dropped into council’s lap. But instead of our Mayor using her vote to spread the wealth by acting on viable options to service the greater population of the Township of King, she instead chose the path of political opportunism, locationally isolating King City from the new rec centre in the process, and pillaging its bounty of development charges to fill in the funding gaps. In terms of recreational options King City’s residents now find themselves stranded at the edge of Vaughan, Richmond Hill and Aurora. With its population poised to explode to 12,000, the Township broke and begging to the Ontario Municipal Board to increase its debt capacity, the reality is that there is little to no money left in reserves, and no chance over the next 20 years of expanding the King City Arena to meet the oncoming demand of 7,000 new residents, over and above the existing 5,000. (Schomberg’s current population is 2,500 (half of King City’s) and is only expected to grow to a mere 3,300 by 2021)

For many here in King City, a sense of betrayal pervades the village, because it now looks like doing the right thing by King City was never on the radar. Instead, King City has been used as a cash cow. A means to an end. And that means, and that end looks like this:

  1. Force Sewers into King City
  2. Balloon the population to 12,000
  3. Collect Development Charge revenue from the new development
  4. Leverage that money to serve the least population

Growth Creates Demand

King City is the largest urban centre in King Township with an existing population of 5,000, but that population is projected to grow to about 12,000 by 2021. Nobleton and Schomberg’s future populations put together amount to only 9,800. (Nobleton 6,500 and Schomberg 3,300 by 2021).

Based on electoral results for Wards 1 and 5 over the past decade, the majority voted against the sewer and the accompanying growth. That’s not to say that there were not people who wanted growth, nor does this statement discount some of the benefits that accompany growth, but the fact is the majority of Wards one and five said NO to this. Yet it was councillors outside of Wards one and five that chose to move against those councillors and the people who elected them. That alone has been enough to muster a feeling of mistrust of the Township council here in King City.

But for those residents who supported the sewer project in King City, consider this and ask yourself, is everything unfolding as you had hoped?

One of the benefits of growth comes via the collection of development charges revenue. This money is collected by the municipality to augment and increase services that will service the projected growth, like in the expansion or building of recreational complexes. To be able to enroll your kids in hockey, figure skating and swimming at a fair and reasonable cost, to be able to join a fitness centre in a local facility with an indoor pool, and to be able to do this all under one roof – these are truly some of the tangible and worthwhile benefits of growth that we have watched occur in our neighbouring municipalities. And seeing as both King City and Nobleton are projected to substantially increase their populations it is unavoidable that a substantial increase in the demand for services is going to occur in those places.

Why then, would your council choose to build a new “Township Recreation Facility“, the only one we will see for some time to come, in a Village that has 1/3 the population of the largest growth centre, and in a location that is the greatest distance from the largest growth centre? Does this strike you as a fair and equitable determination by your council? I ask this of all residents of King Township. Was this the right decision, a fair decision, for ALL the residents of King Township? Does it serve the majority of the population?

Location, Location, Location

Pulling politics out of the equation, the best business model for this facility would have placed it right at Highway 400 and King Road, where the Township owns land, where hundreds of thousands of cars drive past it every single day, and where memberships and naming rights would have been an easy sell. But recognizing that time was of the essence in obtaining this grant, was there another option that could at least give the appearance of equity? One that could appease the politics of location and the needs outlined in the Parks and Recreation Master Plan? YES. There most definitely was. The Village of Nobleton could have easily been argued as the best location for such a facility. This village has the newest among the three existing arenas in the municipality, and Nobleton has both the servicing, and the land required (on the existing arena site) for the expansion – land owned by the Township.

Click to Enlarge

The distance for King City and Schomberg residents to travel to Nobleton is virtually the same. Also, an additional ice hockey pad could have been built, instead of the dedicated curling rink, thereby instantly creating a three pad facility that services the majority while allowing for further expansion for either a pool or a dedicated curling rink . Had we done this, we would have been well on our way to achieving the goals set out in the Master Plan. This would have addressed the issues that exist with the aging arenas in Schomberg and King City (the two oldest) leaving those buildings available for reuse as indoor recreational facilities, or to be sold to generate revenue to pay down the debt on the new Township facility, or to further expand recreational services in the Township.

A 15 Million Dollar Opportunity to Build Township Unity – Squandered

We could have named the three pads after the 3 main urban centres i.e. The Schomberg Rink, The King City Rink and the Nobleton Rink. This would have encouraged the amalgamation of the NobleKing & Schomberg Hockey Associations into one thereby promoting healthy competition within our Municipality, not to mention creating efficiencies that might bring down the cost of hockey for parents while helping everyone to stay under one roof instead of driving all over the country side from one rink to the other. It would bring operating costs down, and if we sold the existing municipal offices/retail plaza in King City, we could use that money to build a proper administrative wing onto this multi-use facility and possibly build the indoor pool that most tax payers said they wanted.

Click to Enlarge

It would also help to promote some healthy economic development in the core of King City, instead of the Township cannibalizing its own commercial tax base by occupying arguably the most valuable piece of village core real estate in the Township of King, and handing developers the argument they needed (market demand study) to direct commercial retail to the King & Dufferin site because King City has a lack of retail. So many willfully mishandled decisions guided by a faction of councillors representing a minority of interests – enabled by the Mayor. And don’t forget, that although the Township will receive almost 10 million dollars in grant money from the province and feds, King Township must still match the respective one third portion of a 15 million dollar project i.e. almost 5 million dollars.

And so what stings the most for King City rate payers is that King City has been forced to grow, against the wishes of its electorate, to a future population of 12,000 by 2021.

Yet the benefits that usually come from growth such as development charge dollars that should be used to increase the service level in the area where growth is occurring, is instead being spent to disproportionately increase services in a part of the Township with the least population.

If this facility were going into Nobleton, I would at least have some logical basis, or moral ground to advocate the concept to the residents of King City, on the basis of servicing, zero land cost, fairness and Township unity. But a curling rink? In Schomberg? Not a chance. Residents here are down right angry. Livid in fact. Even those who’ve voted for Mayor Black in the past are admitting disillusionment. But the extra kick in the pants to all King Township residents will be felt when the unrealistic funding formula to cover the Township’s third can’t be met as we are already seeing with the naming rights estimate of $750,000 missing the mark by $450,000. That shortfall alone equates to a 4.5% increase on your tax bill – now what about the rest?. Try a 20% plus tax increase on for size folks.

The Mayor Must Be Made Accountable

I realize that many who are excited about the new facility do not look favorably on the position I have taken. But upon examination of the facts, I know that anyone with an ounce of open mindedness can see that a serious inequity has been permitted to unfold, in fact facilitated – by our Mayor – who was more focused on her bid for federal politics than she was in ensuring that 12,000 of her existing and future electors in King City were being served fairly.

Was a curling rink the right decision over a pool? Do the needs and wishes of the residents of King City mean nothing? Was Schomberg the fairest location to build this facility or was Nobleton? Why did she spend tax payers dollars on this Master Plan? Why did she toss it out the window?

One thing is certain, that if the tables were turned and council approved a 15 million dollar state of the art bocce court in King City, thereby leveraging virtually all the money the Township will have to spend toward fitness and recreation over the next 20 years, I wonder how Schomberg residents would feel about that – as their 50 year old building was closed down for good, with residents forced to drive to facilities outside of King to accommodate their needs. 10 million dollar grants don’t exactly grow on trees, they come by maybe once in a generation. For King City residents it seems quite apparent that when the Mayor and 3 other members of this council, (who do not live in King City or Nobleton) had the chance, and the power, to serve their Township, they instead slammed the door in our faces. From this side of the Township, one can’t help but wonder if this was the plan all along.

  1. Force Sewers into King City
  2. Balloon the population to 12,000
  3. Collect Development Charge revenue from the new development
  4. Leverage that money to serve the least population

I can tell you, that the anger amongst many of my constituents is real. As King City residents recount and absorb the sequence of events that began 15 years ago to bring us to where we are today, the feeling grows that King City and (now recently) Nobleton have been used as a means to an end. And that end has materialized itself as a 4 pad curling rink, and so called “Township of King Recreation Facility” – in the smallest village in King.

Click to Read Full Article

And the twisted irony is, that the only village in this Township with the word “King” in its name, feels less a part of King Township with each passing day as its residents are forced to go to Aurora, Richmond Hill, Maple and Newmarket to get the kind of municipal services that their own council had not only the power, but the ethical and moral responsibility to provide, yet willfully chose not to.

In speaking with a curling patron excited about this new facility, he said “but King City is getting a new outdoor ball hockey court and skate park.” But here are the facts. The total budget for this small project in King City amounts to $180,000. It was initiated by the King City Lions who are donating $30,000 to it. Additionally, $30,000 that I negotiated from Shoppers Drug Mart is going into it, along with an additional $45,000 that was negotiated with another land developer in King City for a total of $105,000 of privately secured funds. This will more than cover the first phase being the ball hockey court, with the skate park dependent on whatever can be obtained through grants. Where as Schomberg is getting the full benefit of a 10 million dollar grant, with the additional 5 million dollars coming directly from development in King City, as well from taxes that the whole Township will be forced to pay. A double and triple whammy to every resident who lives in or near King City – present and future.

This is why it is true, that a sense of betrayal pervades King City, one that will not soon be forgotten, as the population here quickly balloons, and the demand for recreational services out paces the supply.

Recent Comments

My name is Cleve Mortelliti and I am the Councillor for Ward 1 in the Township of King, Ontario – Canada. I love this Township. King City has been my home since 1972. From 2004 to 2006 I had the privilege to work as an Engineering Administrator for the Township of King. But my overriding desire to make a real difference and to have a more positive, impactful influence on the shape and form of the development wave that is coming to King, led me to leave my employment with the Township and declare my candidacy for Councillor of Ward 1 (King City, Snowball, Kettleby). At approximately 10:00pm on November 13th, 2006 I was truly thrilled to learn that the residents and ratepayers of Ward 1 had bestowed their trust in me to serve as their councillor for the next 4 years . In the successive 2010, and 2014 elections I was re-elected by acclamation. It remains my honour and privilege to serve King.

Recent Comments

King City BLACK and Blue Over Schomberg Rec Centre

On Oct-3-2010
Reported by Cleve Mortelliti

King Council Digging Us All Deeper into Debt

On May-12-2010
Reported by Cleve Mortelliti

Reelin’ in the Years

On Sep-6-2014
Reported by Cleve Mortelliti

It is My Honour and Privilege to Serve King

On Oct-1-2014
Reported by Cleve Mortelliti

Follow the Dates…Connect the Dots…

On Oct-18-2010
Reported by Cleve Mortelliti

Recent Posts